2012.01.17

【2012 CA New Law 6】Independent Contractorの意図的に誤った区分分け

2012年 カリフォルニア州の新しい法律 その6
Independent Contractorの意図的に誤った区分分け

SB459では、意図的に従業員となるべき人をIndependent Contractorに区分分け
した場合に$5,000~$15,000の罰金を課す。
意図的に間違った区分分けをするということは、従業員ステイタスで働くべき人を間違いだと
分かっていながらIndependent Contractorにすることである。
常にその方法が常識化してしまっている場合は、罰金が$10,000~$25,000になる。
この法律では意図的に間違った区分分けをアドアイスしている弁護士でないアドバイザーも罰則対象となる。

Willful Misclassification of Independent Contractors (SB 459)
SB 459 imposes a civil penalty of between $5,000 and $15,000 for each violation on a person or employer that willfully misclassifies an individual as an independent contractor. Willful misclassification is defined as avoiding employee status for an individual by voluntarily and knowingly misclassifying that individual as an independent contractor. The penalty increases to between $10,000 and $25,000 for each violation if the person or employer has engaged in a “pattern or practice” of willful misclassification.
The law also subjects paid, non-attorney advisors to joint and several liabilities with the employer if they knowingly advise the employer to treat an individual as an independent contractor and the individual is not found to be an independent contractor.

|

【2012 CA New Law 5】E-Verify Systemの使用

2012年 カリフォルニア州の新しい法律 その5

E-Verify Systemの使用
AB1236という州法では、連邦法で要求されない限り、雇用者に連邦のE-Verifyシステム
を利用することを要求できない。
E-Verifyはソーシャルセキュリティオフィスと移民局が共同で開発したシステムである。
E-Verifyは雇用者が従業員を雇用する際にプログラムを自主的に使用することを許可している。

▼英文の記事
Use of E-Verify System (AB 1236)
AB 1236 provides that state agencies, cities, and counties cannot require private employers to use the federal E-Verify system to confirm the legal immigration status of workers they hire, except when required by federal law or as a condition of receiving federal funds.
E-Verify is a computerized system maintained and operated by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, in partnership with the Social Security Administration. E-Verify allows employers to use the program, on a voluntary basis, to verify that the employees they hire are authorized to work in the United States.

|

【2012 CA New Law 4】雇用契約の義務

2012年 カリフォルニア州の新しい法律 その4

雇用契約の義務
AB1396ではコミッションの支払いがある場合、雇用契約に盛り込むこととその計算、支払い
方法を記述することが求められる。
雇用者は各従業員にサインしたコピーを渡し、各従業員からサインした受領証明をもらう必要
がある。

▼英文の記事
Employer Contract Requirements (AB 1396)
AB 1396 requires an employer that enters into an employment contract involving commission payments for services to be rendered within California to put the contract in writing and specify the method by which the commissions are to be computed and paid. The employer must give a signed copy of the contract to every employee who is a party thereto and obtain a signed receipt for the contract from each employee. The law also repeals existing law making an employer that violates this requirement liable in a civil action for triple damages.
The law is effective January 1, 2013, giving employers a full year to assure their commission agreements comply with the new law.

|

【2012 CA New Law 3 】採用時の賃金支払い詳細明示義務

2012年 カリフォルニア州 新しい法律 その3

賃金支払いの詳細について
AB469という州法にてnon-exempt employeeに採用時に下記の情報を文書にて
渡すことが義務付けられました。

・時給、(あるいはシフト給、日給、週給、月給、1回あたりの給与、
コミッション、残業代のレート)
・最低賃金、食事や宿泊の手当てについて
・給料日
・雇用者の名前
・雇用者の住所
・雇用者の電話番号
・雇用者のWorkers Compの保険会社名、住所、電話番号
変更があった場合には7日以内に文書で通知すること

▼英文記事
Wage Payment Details (AB 469)
AB 469 requires employers to provide to nonexempt employees, at the time of hire, a written notice indicating the following:
• The rate and basis of pay, whether hourly, shift, day, week, salary, piece, commission, or otherwise, including any rates for overtime
• Any allowances claimed as part of the minimum wage, including meal or lodging allowances
• The regular payday designated by the employer
• The name of the employer, including any “doing business as” names
• The physical address of the employer’s main office or principal place of business, and a mailing address, if different
• The employer’s telephone number
• The name, address, and telephone number of the employer’s workers’ compensation insurance carrier
• Any other information the Labor Commissioner deems material and necessary

The law also requires employers to notify employees in writing of any changes to the information in the notice, within seven calendar days after the time of the changes, unless the changes are reflected on a timely wage statement or other writing required by law.
The law increases penalties for wage violations, provides for employer restitution of certain wages to employees, and extends from one to three years the statute of limitations on collection actions by the state Division of Labor Standards Enforcement.

|

2012.01.06

【2012 CA New Law 2 】Credit Reports 取得の制限

2012年カリフォルニア州で新たに施行される法律シリーズ その2

Credit Reports取得の制限だ。
バックグランドチェックでCredit Reportの情報を取得することを行ってきた会社は多いかもしれない。しかし、今年からはクレジットレポートの取得が許されるポジションが大幅に制限される。
具体的には下記の8つのカテゴリーでのみCredit Reportsのバックグランドチェックが可能と考えられる。

また取得したレポートは従業員本人に公開することが求められる。

普通の会社であれば下記のようなポジションが主な対象ポジションだろう。
1.マネジメントのポジション
2.会社の銀行口座、クレジットカード、振込み等の仕事を行うポジション、あるいは会社の金融機関等の契約を行うポジション。
3.企業機密にアクセスできるポジション
4.常に10,000ドル以上のキャッシュにアクセスするポジション


•Positions with the state Department of Justice
•Sworn peace officers or other law enforcement personnel
•Managerial positions, i.e., employees who qualify for the executive exemption under California wage and hour law
•Positions where the information sought in the credit report must be revealed by law
•Positions (other than the regular solicitation of credit card applications at a retail establishment) that involve regular access to all of the following personal information of any one person: bank or credit card account information, Social Security number, and date of birth
•Positions requiring the employee to be a named signatory on the employer’s bank or credit card, transfer money on the employer’s behalf or be authorized to enter into financial contracts on behalf of the employer
•Positions involving access to trade secrets, as defined
•Positions that involve regular access to $10,000 or more in cash of the employer, a client or a customer


▼英語での情報は下記より
Credit Reports (AB 22)
AB 22 imposes significant restrictions on an employer’s ability to obtain a credit report for employment purposes. It generally permits employers that are seeking to fill only specific, identified exempt positions to obtain and use credit reports to screen applicants or current employees. The use of the credit reports in other occupations generally is prohibited.
Further, employers will be required to provide the employee or applicant with a disclosure statement setting forth the specific basis permitting the employer to obtain a credit report.
Credit reports may be obtained only if the position to be filled falls into one of eight exempt categories:

•Positions with the state Department of Justice
•Sworn peace officers or other law enforcement personnel
•Managerial positions, i.e., employees who qualify for the executive exemption under California wage and hour law
•Positions where the information sought in the credit report must be revealed by law
•Positions (other than the regular solicitation of credit card applications at a retail establishment) that involve regular access to all of the following personal information of any one person: bank or credit card account information, Social Security number, and date of birth
•Positions requiring the employee to be a named signatory on the employer’s bank or credit card, transfer money on the employer’s behalf or be authorized to enter into financial contracts on behalf of the employer
•Positions involving access to trade secrets, as defined
•Positions that involve regular access to $10,000 or more in cash of the employer, a client or a customer

Credit reports also may be obtained for employees of financial institutions subject to Sections 6801-6809 of the United States Code. Technically, such businesses are not required to disclose the statutory support for obtaining a credit report.
California employers should ensure that their practices for obtaining and using credit reports comply with this new enactment. If use of a credit report is permitted, the employer must provide the applicant or employee with a disclosure form that states the permitted basis for the credit check. Employers also should modify forms to ensure compliance with SB 909 (requiring background screening firms to provide subjects of their reports with a Disclosure and Request for Consent before a subject’s data can be sent outside the United States). Multistate employers should ensure compliance with the requirements of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act and applicable state laws.

|

2012.01.04

【最低賃金】2012年 州の最低賃金改定に注意

下記各州の最低賃金改定に注意下さい。
カリフォルニア州は$8のままですが、サンフランシスコシティは$10.24になります。
カリフォルニア州は最低賃金が高いレベルにありましたが、既にOregon, Vermont, Washingtonはそれよりも高いレベルが支払われていますね。

Arizona –
Standard minimum wage increases from $7.35 to $7.65
an hour. Minimum wage for tipped employees increases from $4.35
to $4.65. (The definition of a “tipped employee” differs under many
state laws. However, the term is most commonly used for certain
employees in the hospitality industry.)

Colorado –
Standard minimum wage increases from $7.36 to $7.64
an hour. Minimum wage for tipped employees increases from $4.34
to $4.62 an hour.

Florida –
Standard minimum wage increases from $7.31 to $7.67 an
hour. Minimum wage for tipped employees increases from $4.29 to
$4.65 an hour.

Montana
Standard wage increases from $7.35 to $7.65 an hour.
(Montana law does not allow employers to take a tip credit against
minimum wage for tipped employees.)

Ohio –
Standard minimum wage increases from $7.40 to $7.70 an
hour. Minimum wage for tipped employees increases from $3.70 to
$3.85 an hour.

Oregon –
Standard wage increases from $8.50 to $8.80 an hour.
(Oregon law does not allow employers to take a tip credit against
minimum wage for tipped employees.)

Vermont –
Standard minimum wage increases from $8.15 to $8.46
an hour. Minimum wage for tipped employees increases from $3.95
to $4.10 an hour.

Washington –
Standard minimum wage increases from $8.67 to
$9.04 an hour. (Washington law does not allow employers to take a tip
credit against minimum wage for tipped employees.)

Certain localities also have implemented minimum wage legislation.
For example, in San Francisco, the minimum wage will increase from
$9.92 to $10.24 an hour (California law does not allow employers to
take a tip credit against minimum wage for tipped employees). Such
laws and regulations also must be monitored for changes.

|

【2012 CA New Law 1 】妊娠休暇中の健康保険維持

2012年より施行になる新しい法律シリーズその1
カリフォルニア州にはPregnancy Disability Leaveという妊娠中に1年で4ヶ月まで無給で休暇がとれる法律がある。この間、グループ健康保険を維持する義務はこれまでなかったが、2012年から健康保険を維持する義務がある。(従業員5名以上の雇用者に適用)

Pregnancy Disability Leave (SB 299)
SB 299 prohibits employers from refusing to maintain and pay for group health insurance coverage for the duration of pregnancy disability leave, up to four months in a 12-month period.

The law also authorizes employers to recover insurance premiums from the employee if the employee fails to return from pregnancy disability leave, provided that the employee’s failure is not due to leave taken under the state Moore-Brown-Roberti Family Rights Act (CFRA), for a health condition that entitles the employee to pregnancy disability leave, or other circumstances beyond the employee’s control.
This bill requires that collective bargaining agreements of state agencies provide for continued insurance coverage for state workers on pregnancy disability leave.

This law will have a significant impact on employers because employees who are not eligible for federal Family and Medical Leave Act leave are eligible for pregnancy disability leave. Further, continued insurance coverage provided for pregnancy disability leave will not count against an employee’s right to continued benefits under the FMLA if she subsequently becomes FMLA eligible. The statute also invites possible legal challenges based on ERISA preemption. The affect of the federal Health Reform Law on the new law is unclear at this time.

|

【訴訟】2012年はDOLがらみの訴訟が増える?!

2012はDOLがより積極的に賃金に関する調査、訴訟を強化してきそうだ。
特にIRS, Workers Comp, 移民局等 他の機関と連携をして徹底して調査を強化しそうだということだ。今まで他の役所との連携はあまり聞かなかっただけに注意が必要だ。

・More aggressive action by agencies
・More sharing of information between agencies
・Aggressive investigators that want to see every piece of paper
・Increased scrutiny of wage and hour settlement agreements
・The adding of state law claims to many federal claims
・Continued emphasis on independent contractors

▼参考
http://tinyurl.com/72yqyjw

▼PS:無料相談はお気軽に
http://www.yourphilosophy.net/free_consultation

|

【ポリシー】ソーシャルメディア ポリシーを作っていますか?

ソーシャルメディア ポリシーを作っていますか?

ソーシャルメディアが日常に入り込んで来ると、会社のHRとしても
いろいろな問題が出てくる。
ソーシャルメディアポリシーを持っている会社も増えてきているが
どんな風にしてポリシーを作ったらよいだろうか?

■対象は誰か?
全従業員が対象というのは基本だが、特に会社の機密事項を知っている
従業員にポリシーが必要だ。
・マネジメント
・PR、店頭等公衆に面してる従業員
・そしてもちろん HR

■何を規制するか?
規制するものはできるだけ特定した方がよいが、どんどん新しいものも
できてくるので、リストはオープンエンドに。
twitter
Facebook
YouTube
その他

■どの時間が対象か?
Working Timeはもちろんのこと
Non-Working Timeを対象に含める
ことが重要。

■従業員として公表する場合
・従業員であることを公表することを制限はできないが
会社の製品、イメージ等を扱う場合は公表しないといけない
というポリシーを取るのが一般的。

■機密事項
機密事項も制限する。
・知的資産
・人事情報
・オペレーションの情報
・画像等

■禁止行為
・ハラスメント
・違法行為
・脅迫行為
・誹謗中傷
・差別行為

■その他対応策
担当者:質問に答える担当者を置く
義務例:行動する前に訊く
義務例:ポリシー違反を報告すること
義務例:従業員は違反行為等の調査に協力する義務があること
プライバシー:会社はモニタリングする権利があるということ。


▼無料相談はお気軽に
http://www.yourphilosophy.net/free_consultation

|

2012.01.01

【クイズの答え】FMLA中の従業員にHoliday Bonusは必要?

【クイズの答え】FMLA中の従業員にHoliday Bonusは必要?
答えはYESです。Holiday Bonusは従業員全員に配布しているものなので、FMLA中であっても配布して下さい。

先日の【クイズ】

ある会社では従業員全員にHoliday Bonusを支給しているが、FMLA中の従業員にHoliday Bonusは必要?
答えは必要な場合はYES.不用な場合はNOでお答え下さい。

An employee is out on FMLA leave during the last four weeks of the year, which is when a holiday bonus is given to all employees. Under FMLA, is the employee entitled to the holiday bonus?
No
Yes

|

«【クイズの答え】酔った同僚から。。。これはセクシャルハラスメントですか?